Bernard Lietaer used to start his presentations with this multiple choice:
1) governments 2) central banks 3) private banks
He stopped maybe because his typical audience now points to (3). But beyond the marginalized fringe of money reformers we still live in a world where 80% of the UK population, and 84% (!) of MP’s do not know this. Nor are they likely to believe it when told.
These days you can google “money creation” and find mountains of evidence. Arguably that’s only because following the 2008 crisis the Bank of England thought it prudent to confirm that yes, private banks do “create” money. Not exactly “ex nihilo” but on account of valuing something like an asset or future earnings.
This post was originally just about “Where Does Money Come From? (see excerpts below). But I have now ( Oct 2019) read lots more. Like Ann Pettifor’s “The Production of Money” and Geoffrey Ingham’s The Nature of Money to recommend just two.
A GUIDE TO THE UK MONETARY AND BANKING SYSTEM
JOSH RYAN-COLLINS TONY GREENHAM RICHARD WERNER ANDREW JACKSON FOREWORD BY CHARLES A.E . GOODHART
“ Refreshing and clear . The way monetary economics and banking is taught in many — maybe most — universities is very misleading and what this book does is help people explain how the mechanics of the system work . ” David Miles , Monetary Policy Committee , Bank of England
“ It is amazing that more than a century after Hartley Withers’s ‘ The Meaning of Money ’ and 80 years after Keynes’s ‘ Treatise on Money ’ , the fundamentals of how banks create money still need to be explained . Yet there plainly is such a need , and this book meets that need , with clear exposition and expert marshalling of the relevant facts . Warmly recommended to the simply curious , the socially concerned , students and those who believe themselves experts , alike . Everyone can learn from it . ” Victoria Chick , Emeritus Professor of Economics , University College London
“ I used ‘ Where Does Money Come From ? ’ as the core text on my second year undergraduate module in Money and Banking . The students loved it . Not only does it present a clear alternative to the standard textbook view of money , but argues it clearly and simply with detailed attention to the actual behaviour and functioning of the banking system . Highly recommended for teaching the subject . ” Dr Andy Denis , Director of Undergraduate Studies , Economics Department , City University , London
“ By far the largest role in creating broad money is played by the banking sector . . . when banks make loans they create additional deposits for those that have borrowed . ” Bank of England ( 2007 )
My highlight excerpts
Page 31 3. The Nature and History of Money And Banking
Hence , in orthodox economic theory , the demand for money can be understood almost entirely through its marginal utility . 17 And this was presumed to be relatively constant , in the long run at least , since money was simply representative of the value of other ‘ real ’ commodities . * Hence money was built in to models of general equilibrium with the concept of its neutrality effectively maintained . Mainstream macro – economic models today treat money this way , by including a ‘ money – in – utility ’ function that attempts to show why people desire money , whilst preserving its neutrality . 18
Page 32 3.2. Commodity theory of money: money as natural and neutral
Think about any of the successful entrepreneurs you know . You will probably find that most of them started out with very little money and had to get loans from the bank , friends , or family before they could begin selling their services or products on the market . As Marx pointed out , in the capitalist system , money ( or capital / financing ) is required prior to production , 26 rather than naturally arising after production as a way of making exchange more convenient . This is why it is called ‘ capital – ism ’ . So building a model that starts with market clearing and allocation and then tries to fit in money as a veil on top of this makes little sense .
Page 33 3.3. Credit theory of money: money as a social relationship
The orthodox economics narrative rests upon deductive * assumptions about reality that enable the construction of abstract models . 30 In contrast , researchers who have chosen a more inductive approach , investigating empirically how money and banking actually works , have been more likely to favour the view that money is fundamentally a social relation of credit and debt . These researchers of money come from various academic disciplines . They include : heterodox economists ( including some early twentieth – century economists ) , anthropologists , monetary and financial historians , economic sociologists and geographers and political economists . 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 In fact , the only thing they have in common in terms of their academic discipline is that they are not neo – classical economists .
The historical record suggests that banking preceded coined money by thousands of years . Indeed , historical evidence points to the written word having its origins in the keeping of accounts . The earliest Sumerian numerical accounts consisted of a stroke for units and simple circular depression for tens . 39
Money originated then , not as a cost – minimising medium of exchange as in the orthodox story , but as the unit of account in which debts to the palace , specifically tax liabilities , were measured . 46 , 47
Page 40 3.4. Key historical developments: promissory notes, fractional reserves and bonds
The state’s informal and eventually legal acceptance of goldsmiths ’ fictitious deposit receipts increased the state’s spending power and allowed the creation of modern commercial bank money . Commercial bank money was already in use in seventeenth – century Holland and Sweden and it was now developed in England . These countries were engaged in wars at the time and were short of money . As a result , they took to issuing bonds ( Box 3 ) to the rich merchants and goldsmiths of their respective countries . The practice of bond issuance had begun much earlier in the city states of northern Italy and was another transformative financial innovation – a way for the state and later companies to fund expansionary trade through long – term borrowing without the need for additional metal coinage . 75
Parliament and creditors of the state ( namely the merchants and goldsmiths of the Corporation of London ) lobbied for the creation of a privately owned Bank with public privileges – the Bank of England – and the secession of one square mile of central London as a quasi – sovereign state within the state . * The merchants loaned £ 1.2 million to the state at 8 per cent interest , which was funded by hypothecated customs and excise revenues . 77 The English state had begun to issue bonds and borrow at interest and for the first time , the state committed a proportion of its tax revenues towards the interest payments on long term debts . 78 This system of private credit creation superseded the former system of public money issuance in the form of tallies issued by the Treasury .
Page 42 3.5. Early monetary policy: the Bullionist debates and 1844 Act
The new integration of the state and its creditor class proved to be successful for England and is often held up as one of the key reasons for its defeat of France in the war that followed and for the expansion of English commercial , trade and military power . 80 , 81 It was a model that was eventually imitated over much of the rest of the Western world .
However , importantly , the Act exempted demand deposits – the accounting entries that banks made either when people deposited money with them or , more likely , were created as a result of borrowing – from the legal requirement of the 100 per cent gold reserve backing . We have seen how fractional reserve banking allowed banks to lend multiples of the amount of gold in their vaults . Similarly , they could create new bank deposits through lending or purchasing assets , which were multiples of the amount of now restricted banknotes . Because these account balances were technically a promise by the bank to pay the depositor , they were not restricted by the Act in the same way that banknotes were . This meant that the country banks were able to create them without breaking counterfeiting laws .
No doubt the failure to include demand deposits in the 1844 Act was also related to the strength of the commodity theory of money.
Transaction deposits are the modern counterpart of banknotes . It was a small step from printing notes to making book – entries crediting deposits of borrowers , which the borrowers in turn could ‘ spend ’ by writing checks , thereby ‘ printing ’ their own money . 92 The result was that the 1844 Act failed to stop fractional reserve banking – the creation of new money by private banks . It merely led to a financial innovation in the medium of exchange . At the same time it made the ability of banks to create money out of nothing far less visible : while it is more obvious in Scotland and Northern Ireland , where banks continue to issue paper money carrying their own branding , the general public in England and Wales has no daily reminder of the banks ’ role as the creators of the money supply . This has served to perpetuate the myth – widespread even today – that only the central bank or possibly the Government can create money .
Page 51 3.6. Twentieth century: the decline of gold, deregulation and the rise of digital money
A review of the arguments at the time makes clear that the theoretical support for such deregulation was based on the unrealistic assumptions of neoclassical theoretical economics , in which banks also perform no unique function and are classified as mere financial intermediaries just like stockbrokers . This does not recognise their pivotal role in the economy as the creators of the money supply .
Page 61 4. Money and Banking Today
4.1. Liquidity, Goodhart’s law, and the problem of defining money
Economist Charles Goodhart argued that defining money was inherently problematic because whenever a particular instrument or asset was publicly defined as money by an authority in order to better control it , substitutes were produced for the purposes of evasion5
Page 80 4.7. Managing money: repos, open market operations, and quantitative easing (QE)
Werner has argued that after banking crises one can reduce interest rates to zero or below and this will not produce an economic recovery , since interest rates are not the determining factor of bank credit creation .
All three channels are indirect , and all attempt to stimulate the real economy by acting through the financial sector . So , bond purchase operations and QE do not involve creating ( or ‘ printing ’ ) money if by ‘ money ’ , we mean more money in the real economy that is being used in GDP – related transactions . Although it may well have pushed down medium to long term interest rates and made it easier for the Government to borrow by creating significant additional demand for gilts , since at least 2010 the main criticism of QE has been that it has failed to stimulate bank lending in the real economy . Bank credit creation shrank in 2011 and the UK economy moved into a double – dip recession in 2012 . †
Page 103 5. Regulating Money Creation and Allocation
5.5. Endogenous versus exogenous money
In reality , the tail wags the dog : rather than the Bank of England determining how much credit banks can issue , one could argue that it is the banks that determine how much central bank reserves and cash the Bank of England must lend to them
Thus , there are inconsistencies when attempting to describe the money creation process as purely endogenous . Whether the central bank is able to influence money creation depends very much on how it chooses to intervene .
As US economists Jaffee and Russel showed in 1976 and as Stiglitz and Weiss showed in 1981 , banks prefer to ration and allocate credit – even in the best of times . 37 Paul Tucker , Deputy Governor of the Bank of England , appears to agree : . . . [ households and companies ] . . . are rationed in their access to credit , given that borrowers know a great deal more about their conditions and prospects than do risk – averse lenders , and that lenders face obstacles in ensuring that borrowers honour their contracts . 38
5.6. Credit rationing, allocation and the Quantity Theory of Credit
An interesting example of how credit rationing affects the macro – economy arises when comparing banks ’ incentives for mortgage lending vis à vis lending to small business .
12 : The Quantity Theory of Credit The link between money and the economy is a central pillar of economic theories and models . The ‘ equation of exchange ’ offers such a fundamental link , as it says that The amount of money changing hands to pay for transactions is equal to the value of these transactions . The most common application in most major economic theories is as follows : MV = PY which says that money ( M ) times the speed of its circulation ( velocity – V ) is equal to prices ( P ) times nominal GDP ( Y ) *
When combined with further assumptions , this equation has become known as the ‘ Quantity Theory of Money ’ . 48 An important assumption is that velocity is constant or at least stable . However , empirically velocity has been unstable and since the 1980s has frequently and significantly declined in many economies . The net result is a lack of reliable or predictable links between measures of money and nominal GDP . Consequently , economic theories that do not include money or banks increased in popularity and came to dominate mainstream economics ( as explored further in section 2.2.2 ) . However , such theories and models have been much criticised since the financial crisis of 2008. 49 , 50
Based on empirical observation and institutional analysis Werner argues that banks ration credit and hence the credit supply is the driving variable .
Page 112 5.7. Regulating bank credit directly: international examples
Detailed research on the efficacy of window guidance by the Bank of Japan has shown that this monetary policy tool has always worked extremely effectively , even when the goals set by the central bank were the wrong ones , such as the expansion of financial and speculative credit in the 1980s . In other words , credit guidance is an effective tool , although this is no guarantee that the policy goals selected will be the right ones . Economic history thus provides evidence that a simple regime of credit guidance , combined with adequate incentives ( both carrots and sticks ) for the banking system is an attractive avenue for delivering stable and high economic growth that is sustainable and , crucially , without recurring banking crises .
6. Government Finance and Foreign Exchange
Page 119 6.1. The European Union and restrictions on government money creation
While the issuance of government money to fund fiscal expenditure is often thought to be inflationary , this need not be the case , especially if limited by the amount of money – supply expansion needed to reach the growth potential of the economy .
Page 122 6.2. Government taxes, borrowing and spending (fiscal policy)
If the Government is running a deficit , then spending outflows exceed tax inflows . To make the account balance , the difference can be made up by the issuance of government money – a practice not adopted since before 1945 ( see section 7.6.3 ) – or else must be made up through government borrowing . The government borrows primarily by issuing government bonds , or ‘ gilts ’ ( see section 3.4.3 , box 3 ) . Because the Government is perceived to be the safest borrower available as it need never default on debt denominated in its own currency ( for reasons explained above ) , government bonds are usually sold with ease to investors .
Page 137 7. Conclusions
It is the ability of banks to create new money , independently of the state , which gave rise to modern capitalism and makes it distinctive . As political economist Geoffrey Ingham describes it , following Joseph Schumpeter : The financing of production with money – capital in the form of newly created bank money uniquely specifies capitalism as a form of economic system . Enterprises , wage labour and market exchange existed to some small degree , at least , in many previous economic systems , but . . . their expansion into the dominant mode of production was made possible by the entirely novel institution of a money – producing banking system . 1
Page 138 7.1. The history of money: credit or commodity?
However , deregulation and developments in technology have brought us to a situation where commercial banks now completely dominate the creation of credit and , hence , the money supply . This is the case even though the acceptability of money is guaranteed by the state and the security of bank deposits backed ultimately by the tax – payer .
Page 139 7.2. What counts as money: drawing the line
A further difficulty in defining money arises from the tension between its role as a means of exchange – where the more liquid the better – and its role as a store of value , where generally assets which are less liquid , such as homes , tend to hold their value more effectively against inflation . 6 It may be that different conceptions of money are partly driven by the relative importance that people place on the different functions of money at different times – whether they consider its usefulness as a store of value to be the most important aspect , or its usefulness and availability as a means of exchange . This tension merits further research , because it points to the possibility that no single form of money will perform all the functions of money equally well .
Page 139 7.3. Money is a social relationship backed by the state
Money is a social relationship backed by the state The implications of the credit model of money are profound . Rather than being neutral or a veil over the ‘ real ’ activities of the economy ( trade , exchange , the use of land and labour ) , it becomes clear that money – as an abstract , impersonal claim on future resources – is a social and political construct . As such , its impact is determined by whoever decides what it is ( the unit of account ) , who issues it , how much of it is issued to whom and for what purpose .
Page 141 7.4. Implications for banking regulation and reforming the current system
As the Quantity Theory of Credit shows , fiscal policy does not in itself result in an expansion of the money supply . Indeed the Government has in practice no direct involvement in the money creation and allocation process . This is little known but has an important impact on the effectiveness of fiscal policy and the role of the government in the economy .
Page 143 7.6. Are there alternatives to the current system?
the type of QE policies adopted do not appear to have been effective in boosting GDP growth and employment , as the additional purchasing power remains within the financial sector when bank and investor confidence is low ( see section 4.7.3 on QE ) .
Historically , there are many examples of states directly creating money and putting it in to circulation free of interest . * Indeed , prior to the invention of modern banking at the end of the seventeenth century , most states used simple accounting techniques such as tally sticks in the UK ( see section 3.3.1 ) , minted coins or printed paper money to fund their activities and ensured their widespread adoption through taxation . 27 , 28 , 29 There are also numerous historical examples of governments funding fiscal shortfalls through the issuance of government money .
A range of leading economists , including Irving Fisher33 , Milton Friedman34 , Henry Simons35 , James Tobin36 and Herman Daly37 have argued that a banking system where only the Government is permitted to expand the money supply would be more stable and could be implemented by instituting a 100 % reserve requirement on bank accounts , with banks then playing a true intermediary role of matching savers and borrowers in the way that peer – to – peer lenders now do .
Many naturally resist the notion that private banks can really create money by simply making an entry in a ledger . Economist J . K . Galbraith suggested why this might be The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled . When something so important is involved , a deeper mystery seems only decent. Where Does Money Come From ? categorically establishes that there is no deeper mystery . We therefore must not permit our minds to be repelled , because it is only through the application of proper analysis and further public and policy debate , that we can collectively address the much more significant and pressing question of whether our current monetary and banking system best serves the public interest and , if not , how it should be reformed .